What would a new 767 for Level D have?

I keep on returning to the Level D 767 after flying the PMGD737.  I just have no problems flying the 767. It is sooo smooth.  I was wondering, since the 767 is 6 years old? maybe more, if Level-D was doing the 767 now, what would it change, or add?  For me it seems it has everything I want.  I know there are no plans announced to update it - but technology has changed over the last 6 years - hypothecally - what would LevelD envision as possible improvements to its masterpiece?

Technology has changed in the last 6 years, but the sim hasn't. 

Daryl

The LDS 763, excellent as it is, needs more glass and updated grafix.

IS&S flat panel

Forgetting graphics, I haven't found anything in the NGX that really surpasses anything we didn't already have in the 767. Took the competition long enough to catch up!   Sure, the NGX has a HUD but that doesn't make it better, really.

Best regards,
Robin.

Okay... this is the problem with these kinds of topics: the comparison game.

What would you consider glass? The EFIS is modeled as close to the R/W counterpart as possible within the limitations of flight sim. The 763 was introduced when glass was in it's infancy, so it's a cross-breed. If you want more glass, fly a newer plane. 

I sat on the fence for a long time before taking the plunge and buying the 763.  Admittedly, I was intimidated by the complexity of the aircraft.  That said, I have come to love flying the baby heavy and am often pondering where to stretch it's legs to next.  I have a couple minor gripes in that the FMC won't accept a ZFW above 288.0K though at times I am sitting at the gate with a ZFW of 291K when doing a shorter flight.  I too have fix/approach issues in that some are simply not there.  LVS vortac on J18/19 comes to mind as does ILS1R at KIAD.  However, these don't take away from my enjoyment of the sim or of this plane which is quickly becoming my second wife, (just ask my first.)  As for things that I would like to see in a future version would simply be other members of the family.  The -200 should be a "simple" build being of similar technology as the -300. The -400 would be more challenging from a programing standpoint as it is newer technology that parallels the 777.  Still, I think that these would make for excellent stable mates for the -300ER that we have all come to enjoy.

I personally think its perfect. Maybe I'm used to it since I first flew it in 2005. But its smooth as butter. Handles great. I think she still looks great and I get in the mood of flying something that looks a little dated but has enough systems to keep me busy.

I see no problem with the textures present. 

I like this one just the way it is.. Perhaps a widescreen option added.